Presidential election singapore : Videos
Presidential election singapore : Photo Gallery
Presidential election singapore : Latest News, Information, Answers and Websites
Singapore says four qualify for presidential election | Reuters
5 days ago ... SINGAPORE, Aug 11 (Reuters) - Four candidates are eligibleto contest this month's presidential election in Singapore, thegovernment said on ...
Singapore's presidential election on August 27
So far, five men are eyeing Singapore's highest public office but whether they are eligible to contest will be decided by the Presidential Elections ...
Singaporean presidential election, 2011 - Wikipedia, the free ...
The Singapore presidential election of 2011 is the fourth Singapore presidential election. Nomination Day will be August 17, and Polling Day will be August ...
dr. mahathir mohamad and dr. anwar ibrahim fight it out in a presidential election?
IT IS ABOUT TIME A REPUBLIC OF MALAYSIA BE SET UP ON THE EVE OF THE RUSSIAN RED ARMY INVASION OF THE BALTIC NATIONS AND THE STATE OF ISRAEL.
A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION COULD BE HELD BETWEEN DR. MAHATHIR MOHAMMAD AND DR. ANWAR IBRAHIM.
MALAYSIAN PEOPLE COULD DECIDE WHETHER DR. MAHATHIR SHOULD BECOME THE PRESIDENT OF MALAYSIA OR DR. ANWAR?
ACCORDING TO MALAY LEGEND, HAND TUAH FOUGHT WITH HANG JEBAT AND WON THE FIGHT BECAUSE OF THE TAMING SARI KRIS
HERE WE MUST UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE LIVING IN A MODERN ERA AND WE MUST FACE REALITY WHICH MEAN WE CANNOT SETTLE AN ISSUE WITH TAMING SARI KRIS BUT WITH MODERN WEAPON.
MODERN FIGHT IS CALLED POLITICAL FIGHT AND WHICH MEAN USING A PARTY TO FIGHT ANOTHER PARTY.
HENCE MODERN DAY TAMING SARI KRIS IS UMNO.
THE OTHER KNIVE IS PARTY KEADILAN MALAYSIA?
HENCE, IF A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IS HELD THEN BARISAN NATIONAL WILL FIGHT WITH PAKATAN RAAYAT.
IF DR. MAHATHIR WIN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND BECOME THE PRESIDENT OF MALAYSIA THEN DR. ANWAR WILL START ANOTHER MAY 13 WHICH WILL BE WORSE THEN THE FIRST ONE IN 1969.
ANYWAY, WE MUST GO BACK TO THE ISSUE AND WHY DR. ANWAR WANT TO FIGHT WITH DR. MAHATHIR?
IF WE READ THE MASS MEDIA, WE DISCOVERED THAT DR. ANWAR SAID THAT IT WAS DR. MAHATHIR WHO PUT HIM IN JAIL.
SECONDLY, MALAY SULTANS ARE ANGRY AT DR. MAHATHIR FOR TAKING ALL THEIR POWERS AWAY.
TECHNICALLY SPEAKING THE PRIME MINISETER HAS TOTAL POWER TO DECLARE WAR AND EMERGENCE WITHOUT SULTAN CONSENT.
HENCE, ALL THE SULTANS NOW SUPPORT DR. ANWAR.
IT LOOK LIKE THE SULTANS WILL BRING SOME CHARGERS AGAINST DR. MAHATHIR AND PASS THE DEATH SENTENCE.
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL HIDE DR. MAHATHIR.
DR. ANWAR THINK THAT THE SULTANS ARE TOO CRUEL AND DECIDE TO TURN MALAYSIA UNSIDEDOWN WITH HIS SUPPORTER NUMBERING 6,000,000?
NOW THE SULTAN FEAR DR. ANWAR AND THINKING THAT THE ONLY PERSON WHO COULD STOP DR. ANWAR IS DR. MAHATHIR.
THE GOVERNMENT INFORM THE SULTANS THAT DR. MAHATHIR IS ALIVE AND THE SULTAN PARDON HIM.
HENCE, THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION TAKE PLACE.
DR. MAHATHIR WIN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.
DR. ANWAR FEEL DEJECTED AND DECIDE TAKE HIS WAR TO THE STREET.
A CIVIL WAR BREAK OUT AND DR. ANWAR IS INJURED AND DECIDED TO TAKE REFUGE IN DR. MAHATHIR HOUSE OR VILLAGE.
THIS IS A JUST A SCENARIO WHAT WILL HAPPENED TO MALAYSIA DURING THE THIRD WORLD WAR.
WITH THIS CIVIL WAR, UMNO MEMBERS WILL LEAVE FOR SOUTH AFRICA.
PAS PARTY WILL TAKE FULL CONTROL OF MALAYSIA.
THAILAND WILL INVADE MALAYSIA BECAUSE PAS PARTY SUPPORT FOR THE 6,000.000 MALAYS IN SOUTHERN THAILAND.
THAILAND WILL OVER RAN WEST MALAYSIA AND SINGAPORE.
INDONESIA WILL OVER RAN EAST MALAYSIA OF SABAH, SARAWAK AND BRUNEI.
BY NOW ABOUT 300,000,000 INDONESIAN WOULD HAVE MIGRATED TO BORNEO BECAUSE ALL THE VOLCANOES IN JAVA AND SUMATRA START TO EXPLODE LIKE 1,000,000 HYROGEN BOMBS.
IT IS INTINCT TO SURVIVE THAT MAKE THE INDOENSIA MIGRATE TO BORNEO.
MALAY FEAR THE ARRIVAL OF 300,000,000 INDONESIAN TO BORNEO AND DECIDED TO MIGRATE TO SOUTH AFRICA TO BE FAR AWAY FROM INDONESIAN BIG BROTHERS.
HENCE, 600 YEARS OF MALAY SULTANIC RULE COME TO AN END IN MALAYSIA AND THE MASS MIGRATION OF 12,000,000 MALAYS TO SOUTH AFRICA BY LAND, SEA AND AIR.
THE 6,000,000 ISRAELITE HAVE MIGRATE TO SINAI PENINSULAR AND 12,000,000 MALAYS HAVE NO CHOISE BUT FOLLOW WHAT THE JEWS HAVE BEEN DOING SINCE 1400 BC.
THEY SAY, HISTORY REPEAT ITSELF.
BY THE WAY, THAI POPULATON IS 70,000,000 PEOPLE AND ONE DAY IT WILL HIT THE 700,000,000 MARK.
THOSE THAIS NEED LAND AND SO THEY WILL GRAP MALAYA SO THAT 35,000,000 THAIS WILL MIGRATE TO MALAYA TO START A NEW LIFE HERE.
IF THE MALAY KNOWS THE TRUTH THEN THEY SHOULD START MIGRATING TO SOUTH AFRICA NOW OTHERWISE THEY WILL LOOSE ALL THEIR PROPERTIES TO THE 35,000,000 THAIS.
PREVENTION IS BETTER THEN CURE.
THE MOST THE AMERICAN CAN DO FOR THE 12,000,000 MALAYS IS TO TRANSPORT THEM TO SOUTH AFRICA.
AMERICAN DOES NOT WANT TO LOOSE 65,000 DEAD IN THAILAND?
AMERICAN LOST 65,000 DEAD IN VIETNAM?
AMERICAN SEND 2,000,000 SOLDIERS TO VIETNAM FROM 1960 TO 1975 OR 15 YEARS?
HENCE, HELPING THOSE 12,000,000 TO MIGRATE TO SOUTH AFRICA IS THE BEST OPTION.
SO, IT LOOK LIKE DR. MAHATIR AND DR.ANWAR WILL START THEIR PLAY ANYTIME NOW.
CNN AND BBC WILL HAVE A FIELD DAY FOR 6,000,000,000 PEOPLE TO WATCH THE WINNER.
WHATEVER IT IS, SOMETIME HISTORY REPEAT ITSELF AND IT IS DIFFICULT TO STOP IT BUT WATCH IT HAPPEN BEFORE EYES.
THE ONLY WAY OUT OF THIS MASS IS TO GO FOR "MALAYSIAN RIGHTS" RATHER "THE MALAY RIGHTS"?
WE GOT TO FACE REALITY THAT THE LAND OF TWO KINGS NAMELY THAILAND AND INDONESIA WILL INVADE MALAYSIA ANYTIME NOW?
THE MALAYSIAN GOVERNMENT BETTER COME UP WITH THE BEST PLAN MONEY CAN BUY.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hang_Tuah
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hang_Jebat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barisan_Nasional
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Political_parties_in_Malaysia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakatan_Rakyat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahathir_bin_Mohamad
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_Ibrahim
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_of_Rulers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesia-Malaysia_confrontation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Thailand_insurgency
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia-Thailand_border
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Thailand
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peopling_of_Thailand
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_volcanoes_in_Indonesia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anak_Krakatau
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africa
http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0geu5iNwiFIQUQBvRBXNyoA?p=SOUTH+AFRICA&fr=yfp-t-369&ei=UTF-8&fp_ip=MY&rd=r1&meta=vc%3Dmy
Answer: You are in the wrong forum for expecting answers in in USA - ANSWERS - Yahoo!
Category: Politics
Singapore Presidential Election 2011
Breaking tradition from previous Presidential Elections, especially the last two that ended in walkovers, this turned out to be a stiff multi-corner contest ...
Mousavi as Zhao Ziyang, Khamenei as Deng Xiaoping, Ahmadinejad as Li Peng?
Ruhollah Khomeini as Mao Zedong?
Here are the Wikipedia articles.
Iranian presidential election, 2009
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_election_2009
Tiananmen Square protests of 1989
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989
Mir-Hossein Mousavi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir-Hossein_Mousavi
Zhao Ziyang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhao_Ziyang
Ali Khamenei
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei
Deng Xiaoping
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deng_Xiaoping
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad
Li Peng
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Peng
Ruhollah Khomeini
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruhollah_Khomeini
Mao Zedong
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Zedong
and before you say,
"Yeah, and look what happened",
consider.
If what I understand correctly, as well as the mass murder and brutal suppression of political dissidents, the Communist party in China maintains its rule by letting off some pressure in the form of:
(1) economic reforms
(2) easing up on cultural freedoms
and
(3) allowing Hong Kong to maintain a lot of its relative freedom.
Presumably Chinese might also be able to look to Macao, Taiwan, and Singapore.
What do the mullarchs in Iran have to offer the people
--the young people in particular
--particularly while Admadinejad is pro-natalist, China has pursued a "one-child" policy.
(1) Will admadinejad loosen up the economy--and anger many of his poorer supporters;
or make Los Angeles, and perhaps to a lesser extent London and (my beloved--ha!!) Toronto as de facto Iranian urban economic centres and capital?
(2) Will they ease up on the culture?
(3) Will they allow some autonomous zone of Freedom?
Answers and comments will be perused and appreciated.
:-)
LGBT rights in Iran
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Iran
Homosexuality in China
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_China
LGBT rights in Taiwan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Taiwan
HORIZONS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HORIZONS
"HORIZONS is Hong Kongs second oldest gay group after Hong Kong Ten Percent Club, and it became the first gay group in Hong Kongs history to gain recognition from the government as a listed charity on October 22, 2001."
Answer: LOL I really enjoyed the category you've chosen for your good question Civic! that's awesome! Ahmadinejad as Li Peng? hmmm
Category: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered
Sri Lanka and Israel, behind the assasination of the late Mr Rajiv Gandhi ?
Although Indians have forgotten the assasination of Mahatma Gandhi ,
None would have forgotten the night of 21st May 1991 when the erstwhile Prime Minister Mr Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated by a female suicide bomber
Typically one blames the Tamil Tigers the LTTE for the attack, they were in no choice to that they too have to accept the blame.
Lets look deeper into the assasination
Sri Lankan government under President Premadasa was as anti-Rajiv Gandhi as the LTTE. Premadasa opposed the India-Sri Lanka Peace Accord of 1987 and the induction of Indian troops into Sri Lanka in 1987 from the very beginning. His presidential election campaign included a pledge to get the Indian troops out of Sri Lanka. His first foreign policy initiative as the newly elected president was to request India to withdraw its troops from Sri Lanka. When Rajiv Gandhi procrastinated, Premadasa did the unexpected and the unthinkable - he secretly supplied large quantities of arms to the Sri Lankan governments long-term enemy, the LTTE. Finally, the Indian troops were withdrawn in 1990
Sri Lankan government under President Premadasa had a motive to see that Rajiv Gandhi did not come to power again. Did the Sri Lankan government have the means (the ability) to assassinate Rajiv Gandhi in Tamil Nadu?
Could the very assasination have means of ways to turn India against LTTE ?
Firstly Indira Gandhi was PRO LTTE, getting Bangladesh freed, se was in the path to deal the Lankan issue as well, unfortunately she was asssinated by her Sikh Soldier, once Rajiv took office, his style was different but not against the LTTE, though the Indian Peace keeping forces made a hell of a nuisence by raping the Tamil women and etc... Rajiv concern was entirely peace
Rajiv Gandhi opposing relations with Israel
Yasser Arafat was close to the Nehru-Gandhi family — and had personally warned Rajiv Gandhi of a plot to assassinate him during the 1991 election campaign.
By 1987, India’s Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi convinced Sri Lankan President Junius Jayawardene to sign the Indo-Sri Lankan peace accord, which gave autonomy to the Tamil areas in the north and east of the island. An amnesty was declared, and 3,000 Indian troops were sent as peacekeepers.
Then Indian troops started to confiscate Mossad arms. In 1987, the Hindustan Times reported that in the Sri Lankan city of Jaffna, the troops seized large quantities of arms with Israeli markings, meant for the Tamils.
Israel panicked, since peace would put an end to their death market. The inner circle of the Indian RAW also became worried, since they were on the Mossad payroll. What would become of their paychecks? Worse, when Rajiv Gandhi drafted the peace accord, he demanded that all Israelis leave Sri Lanka, since everyone knew that Jews maintained the violence there.
Therefore the Jews (and perhaps the inner RAW circle) started plotting to liquidate Rajiv Gandhi. The Jews also increased their arms to both the Tamils and their enemies (the Singhalese) against Ghandi’s 3,000 Indian troops.
In 1989 Ranasinghe Premadasa became President of Sri Lanka
Premadasa allowed Mossad to arm the enemy (the Tamils) in hopes that the Tamils would wipe out the JVP Buddhists, and also cause the Indian troops to leave Sri Lanka. Meanwhile the Jews committed a series of false flag murders, causing all sides to escalate into worse and worse atrocities.
India’s Prime Minister Rajiv Ghandi responded by sending 97,000 additional troops.
By the following year (1990) Jewish false flags massacres had reduced Sri Lanka to a quagmire for India. Under political pressure at home, Rajiv Gandhi withdrew the army, but used the Indian navy to completely shut down the Jewish arms trade in Sri Lanka. In November 1991, the Indian Navy seized an Israeli ship carrying large amounts of arms and ammunition from Singapore to the Tamils.
The Jews could tolerate no more interference from Gandhi
for shutting down the Israeli arms trade,
Gandhi was assassinated on 21 May 1991,
On 8 Aug 1984, Ghandi’s mother, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, condemned Sri Lankan President J.R.Jayewardene for bringing Mossad into Sri Lanka. Two months later, Sikh separatists gunned down Indira Gandhi, probably using intelligence furnished by Mossad.
Five weeks before Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated, Yasser Arafat in Palestine warned him that a hit was planned.
The bomb that killed Rajiv Gandhi was composed of RDX explosives thought to have been manufactured in Israel. The conspirators’ trial was held in total secrecy, and court records have never been released.
Source:Dr.Norman Baker
in the Illustrated Weekly of India
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/5332
Also that Rajiv Gandhi Covertly sabotaged an Israel Military plan to bomb Nacent Pakistani Nuclear Establishment from Being bombed ?
Israel SECRETLY Requested Indian Government under Rajiv Gandhi , to offer bases to its Air Force so tha
Answer: Prabhakaran has himself admitted that LTTE killed Rajiv Gandhi. Also Indian intelligence has much proof against LTTE.
I admit Sri Lanka opposed the presence of IPKF in their land, but at that time, LTTE was much larger enemy to India, as it killed Indian soldiers, created problems in peace talks & killed many Tamil leaders on whom India was depending for peace talks.
It doesn't mean that Israel was behind the plan becoz RDX used there was made in Israel. LTTE might have smuggled them.
Category: Current Events
Economy questions I need help with before final. 10 points
1.Contagion started in ________ and involved financial problems which were described as a__________.
a.Asia // lack of production of any investment goods
b.Asia // bubble
c.the United States // bubble
d.the United States and Mexico // lack of foreign trade
2.Long Term Capital Management was in __________. Contagion _______ affect the firm.
a.the United States – did not
b.the United States – did
c.Thailand – did
Singapore – did not
3.The ________ treaty was negotiated by the first President Bush and became an issue in the 1992 Presidential election. The treaty involved _____________.
a.NAFTA / lowering trade barriers
b.NAFTA / raising most tariffs in order to pressure Mexico into enforcing its environmental laws
c.ERA / lowering trade barriers
d.WTO / raising most tariffs in order to pressure Mexico into enforcing its environmental laws
4.The significance of eggs in Poland was
a.it was looked upon as an exotic luxury item.
b.the availability and price of eggs signified whether the free market was working.
c.the communist government did not permit the manufacturing of eggs.
all of the above.
5. Joseph Stalin’s idea of central planning in the Soviet Union can best be described as taking control of
a.the stock market.
b.the banks.
c.all economic production.
the government.
6The policy combinations given below would consistently work in the direction of DECREASING the rate of growth of the money supply, also known as contractionary policy are
a.Raise the discount rate, lower the reserve requirement and engage in open market sales.
b.Lower the discount rate, lower the reserve requirement and engage in open market purchases.
c.Lower the discount rate, raise the reserve requirement and engage in open market sales.
d.Raise the discount rate, raise the reserve requirement and engage in open market sales of bonds.
e.Raise the discount rate, raise the reserve requirement and engage in open market purchases of bonds.
7Which of the two talked about the problem of insufficient spending?
a.Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes
b.John Maynard Keynes and Karl Marx
c.Adam Smith and Karl Marx
d.Groucho and Harpo Marx
8According to Marx
a.socialism and communism could exist simultaneously in any society.
b.capitalism would inevitably end.
c.technological change and class conflict go hand-in-hand.
d.both b) and c) are correct.
e.both a) and b) are correct.
9.The Laffer curve of supply-side economics shows that it is not always possible to increase tax revenues by increasing marginal tax rates.
a.true
b.false
10.A horizontal supply curve of labor is consistent with
a.flexible wages.
b.rigid wages.
c.full employment.
d.efficiency wages.
e.both b) and d) are correct.
11. Consider the equation of exchange MV=PQ. Assume V and Q are constant. Therefore an increase in the money supply will cause
a. recession.
b. more output.
c. an increase in the price level.
d. both b) and c) are correct.
22.Joe and Mo produce raincoats and shirts. Joes opportunity cost for producing a raincoat is 5 shirts. Mos opportunity cost for producing a raincoat is 12 shirts. Therefore
a.Joe has a comparative advantage in the production of raincoats.
b.Mo has a comparative advantage in the production of raincoats.
c.Joe has no comparative advantage in producing anything.
d.Mo has no comparative advantage in producing anything.
13. Comparative advantage is the ability of a country to produce a good at a ____________ opportunity cost relative to other countries. It ____ possible to have a comparative advantage even if the country does not have an absolute advantage in producing anything.
a. higher // is
b. lower // is
c. equivalent // is not
d. higher // is not
14.If the U.S. has inflation, but British prices stay stable, then
a.the dollar will depreciate.
b.the pound will appreciate.
c.one will give up less pounds for a dollar than before.
d.all of the above.
15.Are all three of these equivalent?
1 U.S.$ = 5 Toba Dollars
1 Toba Dollar = 20 U.S. cents
2 Toba Dollars = 2/5 U.S.$
a.yes
b.no
16.The Federal Reserve can make the dollar stronger in foreign exchange if it buys up dollars, which is the equivalent of a contractionary monetary policy.
a.true
b.false
Answer: Some answers are here, although I don't know if they're correct (also, note that the questions are in a different order) --
http://www.answersocean.com/Economics/need-help-with-9-economics-questions-easy-points-available?_402634
Category: Homework Help
TODAYonline | Singapore Votes | Detailed coverage of Presidential ...
SINGAPORE - From Nomination Day tomorrow (Aug 17), right through to Polling Day on Aug 27,...
World wants Obama as president: poll?
US Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama may be struggling to nudge ahead of his Republican rival in polls at home, but people across the world want him in the White House, a BBC poll said.
All 22 countries covered in the poll would prefer to see Senator Obama elected US president ahead of Republican John McCain.
In 17 of the 22 nations, people expect relations between the US and the rest of the world to improve if Senator Obama wins.
More than 22,000 people were questioned by pollster GlobeScan in countries ranging from Australia to India and across Africa, Europe and South America.
The margin in favour of Senator Obama ranged from 9 per cent in India to 82 per cent in Kenya, while an average of 49 per cent across the 22 countries preferred Senator Obama compared with 12 per cent preferring Senator McCain. Some four in 10 did not take a view.
"Large numbers of people around the world clearly like what Barack Obama represents," GlobeScan chairman Doug Miller said.
"Given how negative Americas international image is at present, it is quite striking that only one in five think a McCain presidency would improve on the Bush administrations relations with the world."
In the United States, three polls taken since the Republican party convention ended on Thursday (local time) show Senator McCain with a lead of 1 to 4 percentage points - within the margin of error - and two others show the two neck-and-neck.
The countries most optimistic that an Obama presidency would improve relations were Americas NATO allies, including Australia (62 per cent).
A similar BBC/Globescan poll conducted ahead of the 2004 U.S presidential election found that, of 35 countries polled, 30 would have preferred to see Democratic nominee John Kerry, rather than the incumbent George Bush, who was elected.
A total of 23,531 people in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Kenya, Lebanon, Mexico, Nigeria, Panama, the Philippines, Poland, Russia, Singapore, Turkey, the UAE, Britain and the United States were interviewed face-to-face or by telephone in July and August 2008 for the poll.
simplybrainless or whatever your name is - DONT KID YOURSELF!!!
REPUBLICANS ARE IN DENIAL.
FACE THE FACTS REPUBLICAN ORE NOT LIKE AROUND THE WORLD.
AMERICANS ARE NOT DISLIKED
McBUSH IS NOT LIKED
Answer: The whole world knows the truth about McCain. He would probably start another war instead of seeking peace. I think enough our men and women have been killed for no good reason.
It's OBAMA/BIDEN ALL THE WAY!
Category: Elections
Mousavi as Zhao Ziyang, Khamenei as Deng Xiaoping, Ahmadinejad as Li Peng?
Ruhollah Khomeini as Mao Zedong?
Here are the Wikipedia articles.
Iranian presidential election, 2009
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_election_2009
Tiananmen Square protests of 1989
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989
Mir-Hossein Mousavi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir-Hossein_Mousavi
Zhao Ziyang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhao_Ziyang
Ali Khamenei
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei
Deng Xiaoping
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deng_Xiaoping
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad
Li Peng
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Peng
Ruhollah Khomeini
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruhollah_Khomeini
Mao Zedong
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Zedong
and before you say,
"Yeah, and look what happened",
consider.
If what I understand correctly, as well as the mass murder and brutal suppression of political dissidents, the Communist party in China maintains its rule by letting off some pressure in the form of:
(1) economic reforms
(2) easing up on cultural freedoms
and
(3) allowing Hong Kong to maintain a lot of its relative freedom.
Presumably Chinese might also be able to look to Macao, Taiwan, and Singapore.
What do the mullarchs in Iran have to offer the people
--the young people in particular
--particularly while Admadinejad is pro-natalist, China has pursued a "one-child" policy.
(1) Will admadinejad loosen up the economy--and anger many of his poorer supporters;
or make Los Angeles, and perhaps to a lesser extent London and (my beloved--ha!!) Toronto as de facto Iranian urban economic centres and capital?
(2) Will they ease up on the culture?
(3) Will they allow some autonomous zone of Freedom?
Answers and comments will be perused and appreciated.
:-)
Answer: yes. the 2009 Iranian election protests have a lot in common with the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests. the people of Iran are brave.
Category: Current Events
Mousavi as Zhao Ziyang, Khamenei as Deng Xiaoping, Ahmadinejad as Li Peng?
Ruhollah Khomeini as Mao Zedong?
Here are the Wikipedia articles.
Iranian presidential election, 2009
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_election_2009
Tiananmen Square protests of 1989
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989
Mir-Hossein Mousavi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir-Hossein_Mousavi
Zhao Ziyang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhao_Ziyang
Ali Khamenei
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei
Deng Xiaoping
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deng_Xiaoping
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad
Li Peng
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Peng
Ruhollah Khomeini
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruhollah_Khomeini
Mao Zedong
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Zedong
and before you say,
"Yeah, and look what happened",
consider.
If what I understand correctly, as well as the mass murder and brutal suppression of political dissidents, the Communist party in China maintains its rule by letting off some pressure in the form of:
(1) economic reforms
(2) easing up on cultural freedoms
and
(3) allowing Hong Kong to maintain a lot of its relative freedom.
Presumably Chinese might also be able to look to Macao, Taiwan, and Singapore.
What do the mullarchs in Iran have to offer the people
--the young people in particular
--particularly while Admadinejad is pro-natalist, China has pursued a "one-child" policy.
(1) Will admadinejad loosen up the economy--and anger many of his poorer supporters;
or make Los Angeles, and perhaps to a lesser extent London and (my beloved--ha!!) Toronto as de facto Iranian urban economic centres and capital?
(2) Will they ease up on the culture?
(3) Will they allow some autonomous zone of Freedom?
Answers and comments will be perused and appreciated.
:-)
Answer: Nice comparison. The only flaw in this comparison would be that the Chinese rebels didnt use violence, they were only students sitting on the ground but got crushed by tanks.
Also, there wasn't any democracy in China back then, not to mention public election.
Category: China
Mousavi as Zhao Ziyang, Khamenei as Deng Xiaoping, Ahmadinejad as Li Peng?
Ruhollah Khomeini as Mao Zedong?
Here are the Wikipedia articles.
Iranian presidential election, 2009
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_election_2009
Tiananmen Square protests of 1989
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989
Mir-Hossein Mousavi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir-Hossein_Mousavi
Zhao Ziyang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhao_Ziyang
Ali Khamenei
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei
Deng Xiaoping
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deng_Xiaoping
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad
Li Peng
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Peng
Ruhollah Khomeini
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruhollah_Khomeini
Mao Zedong
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Zedong
and before you say,
"Yeah, and look what happened",
consider.
If what I understand correctly, as well as the mass murder and brutal suppression of political dissidents, the Communist party in China maintains its rule by letting off some pressure in the form of:
(1) economic reforms
(2) easing up on cultural freedoms
and
(3) allowing Hong Kong to maintain a lot of its relative freedom.
Presumably Chinese might also be able to look to Macao, Taiwan, and Singapore.
What do the mullarchs in Iran have to offer the people
--the young people in particular
--particularly while Admadinejad is pro-natalist, China has pursued a "one-child" policy.
(1) Will admadinejad loosen up the economy--and anger many of his poorer supporters;
or make Los Angeles, and perhaps to a lesser extent London and (my beloved--ha!!) Toronto as de facto Iranian urban economic centres and capital?
(2) Will they ease up on the culture?
(3) Will they allow some autonomous zone of Freedom?
Answers and comments will be perused and appreciated.
:-)
Answer: I've been drawing parallels to 6/4 as well; But, I think major reform is in order, and the Iranian people know it. As long as their is a "Supreme Leader," no election is really going to matter.
Category: Politics
How do you feel about Obamas win?
How do you feel about Obama wining the US Presidential election? What impact do you think it will have on you in Singapore?
Answer: I am proud for Americans in general. I hope he's the medicine America needs. He is our Abraham Lincoln. Our JFK. He is something millions can believe in and look up to. He is the American dream. He is our next President. We should join hands, whether red or blue, to unite these states of America. We need to Unite America where it has begun to unwind with political disunity. Republican, Democrat - it doesn't matter. The dreams and hopes of millions are the same. If it takes McCain, then so be it. Obama has won, though, and I will support my president when he is elected in office. I believe some are just mislead, sore losers. McCain's defeat speech was very well executed. God Bless America.
Category: Elections
Sri Lanka and Israel, behind the assasination of the late Mr Rajiv Gandhi ?
Although Indians have forgotten the assasination of Mahatma Gandhi ,
None would have forgotten the night of 21st May 1991 when the erstwhile Prime Minister Mr Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated by a female suicide bomber
Typically one blames the Tamil Tigers the LTTE for the attack, they were in no choice to that they too have to accept the blame.
Lets look deeper into the assasination
Sri Lankan government under President Premadasa was as anti-Rajiv Gandhi as the LTTE. Premadasa opposed the India-Sri Lanka Peace Accord of 1987 and the induction of Indian troops into Sri Lanka in 1987 from the very beginning. His presidential election campaign included a pledge to get the Indian troops out of Sri Lanka. His first foreign policy initiative as the newly elected president was to request India to withdraw its troops from Sri Lanka. When Rajiv Gandhi procrastinated, Premadasa did the unexpected and the unthinkable - he secretly supplied large quantities of arms to the Sri Lankan governments long-term enemy, the LTTE. Finally, the Indian troops were withdrawn in 1990
Sri Lankan government under President Premadasa had a motive to see that Rajiv Gandhi did not come to power again. Did the Sri Lankan government have the means (the ability) to assassinate Rajiv Gandhi in Tamil Nadu?
Could the very assasination have means of ways to turn India against LTTE ?
Firstly Indira Gandhi was PRO LTTE, getting Bangladesh freed, se was in the path to deal the Lankan issue as well, unfortunately she was asssinated by her Sikh Soldier, once Rajiv took office, his style was different but not against the LTTE, though the Indian Peace keeping forces made a hell of a nuisence by raping the Tamil women and etc... Rajiv concern was entirely peace
Rajiv Gandhi opposing relations with Israel
Yasser Arafat was close to the Nehru-Gandhi family — and had personally warned Rajiv Gandhi of a plot to assassinate him during the 1991 election campaign.
By 1987, India’s Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi convinced Sri Lankan President Junius Jayawardene to sign the Indo-Sri Lankan peace accord, which gave autonomy to the Tamil areas in the north and east of the island. An amnesty was declared, and 3,000 Indian troops were sent as peacekeepers.
Then Indian troops started to confiscate Mossad arms. In 1987, the Hindustan Times reported that in the Sri Lankan city of Jaffna, the troops seized large quantities of arms with Israeli markings, meant for the Tamils.
Israel panicked, since peace would put an end to their death market. The inner circle of the Indian RAW also became worried, since they were on the Mossad payroll. What would become of their paychecks? Worse, when Rajiv Gandhi drafted the peace accord, he demanded that all Israelis leave Sri Lanka, since everyone knew that Jews maintained the violence there.
Therefore the Jews (and perhaps the inner RAW circle) started plotting to liquidate Rajiv Gandhi. The Jews also increased their arms to both the Tamils and their enemies (the Singhalese) against Ghandi’s 3,000 Indian troops.
In 1989 Ranasinghe Premadasa became President of Sri Lanka
Premadasa allowed Mossad to arm the enemy (the Tamils) in hopes that the Tamils would wipe out the JVP Buddhists, and also cause the Indian troops to leave Sri Lanka. Meanwhile the Jews committed a series of false flag murders, causing all sides to escalate into worse and worse atrocities.
India’s Prime Minister Rajiv Ghandi responded by sending 97,000 additional troops.
By the following year (1990) Jewish false flags massacres had reduced Sri Lanka to a quagmire for India. Under political pressure at home, Rajiv Gandhi withdrew the army, but used the Indian navy to completely shut down the Jewish arms trade in Sri Lanka. In November 1991, the Indian Navy seized an Israeli ship carrying large amounts of arms and ammunition from Singapore to the Tamils.
The Jews could tolerate no more interference from Gandhi
for shutting down the Israeli arms trade,
Gandhi was assassinated on 21 May 1991,
On 8 Aug 1984, Ghandi’s mother, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, condemned Sri Lankan President J.R.Jayewardene for bringing Mossad into Sri Lanka. Two months later, Sikh separatists gunned down Indira Gandhi, probably using intelligence furnished by Mossad.
Five weeks before Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated, Yasser Arafat in Palestine warned him that a hit was planned.
The bomb that killed Rajiv Gandhi was composed of RDX explosives thought to have been manufactured in Israel. The conspirators’ trial was held in total secrecy, and court records have never been released.
Source:Dr.Norman Baker
in the Illustrated Weekly of India
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/5332
Also that Rajiv Gandhi Covertly sabotaged an Israel Military plan to bomb Nacent Pakistani Nuclear Establishment from Being bombed ?
Israel SECRETLY Requested Indian Government under Rajiv Gandhi , to offer bases to its Air Force so tha
Answer: a great friend of isreal .
perhaps not.
LTTE of course.
Category: Politics
Would the USA be a better democracy if it had compulsory voting?
These 32 countries have compulsory voting:
Argentina
Australia (compulsory enrolment and voting for both state and national elections)
Austria (presidential elections only)
Belgium
Bolivia
Brazil (non-compulsory for 16 & 17 year olds and those over 70)
Chile (enrolment voluntary)
Costa Rica
Countries that do not enforce compulsory voting:
Countries that enforce compulsory voting:
Cyprus
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt (men only)
Fiji
France (Senate elections only)
Gabon
Greece
Guatemala
Honduras
Italy
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Mexico
Nauru
Netherlands
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Singapore
Switzerland (Schaffhausen)
Thailand
Turkey
Uruguay
Answer: But then I have always considered FREEDOM TO CHOOSE the cornerstone of democratic government. And if the people don't want to exercise their freedom to choose to vote, then who are we to demand that the government MAKE them?!
Did you even notice that of the countries you listed, only a handful of them are little better than third world countries to begin with? I want to believe that socially and economically responsible countries would hesitate to IMPOSE any rules on it's citizens that smack of the "Big Brother" politics of the early Cold War era of the 1950's.
I want to believe that humanity has the ability to evolve to the BETTER.
Category: Elections
The world prefers Obama. Do you?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7606100.st
People outside the US would prefer Barack Obama to become US president ahead of John McCain, a BBC World Service poll suggests.
Democrat Mr Obama was favoured by a four-to-one margin across the 22,500 people polled in 22 countries.
In 17 countries, the most common view was that US relations with the rest of the world would improve under Mr Obama.
If Republican Mr McCain were elected, the most common view was that relations would remain about the same.
The poll was conducted before the Democratic and Republican parties held their conventions and before the headline-grabbing nomination of Sarah Palin as Mr McCains running mate.
BBC diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus says the results could therefore be a reflection of the greater media focus on Mr Obama as he competed for the presidential candidacy against Hillary Clinton.
Pie chart
The margin of those in favour of Mr Obama winning Novembers US election ranged from 9% in India to 82% in Kenya, which is the birthplace of the Illinois senators father.
On average 49% preferred Mr Obama to 12% in favour of Mr McCain. Nearly four in 10 of those polled did not take a view.
On average 46% thought US relations with the world would improve with Mr Obama in the White House, 22% that ties would stay the same, while seven per cent expected relations to worsen.
Only 20% thought ties would get better if Mr McCain were in the Oval Office.
The expectation that a McCain presidency would improve US relations with the world was the most common view, by a modest margin, only in China, India and Nigeria.
But across the board, the largest number - 37% - thought relations under a president McCain would stay the same, while 16% expected them to deteriorate.
In no country did most people think that a McCain presidency would worsen relations.
Sen John McCain in Sterling Heights, Michigan, on 5 September 2008
Some 30% of Americans expected relations to improve under Mr McCain
Oddly, in Turkey more people thought US relations would worsen with an Obama presidency than under Mr McCain, even though most Turks polled preferred Mr Obama to win.
In Egypt, Lebanon, Russia and Singapore, the predominant expectation was that relations would remain the same if Mr Obama won the election.
The countries most optimistic that an Obama presidency would improve ties were US Nato allies - Canada (69%), Italy (64%), France (62%), Germany (61%), and the UK (54%) - as well as Australia (62%), along with Kenya (87%) and Nigeria (71%).
When asked whether the election as president of the African-American Mr Obama would "fundamentally change" their perception of the US, 46% said it would while 27% said it would not.
SEE FULL POLL RESULTS
BBC World Service US election poll [1.7MB]
Most computers will open this document automatically, but you may need Adobe Reader
Download the reader here
The US public was polled separately and Americans also believed an Obama presidency would improve US ties with the world more than a McCain presidency.
Forty-six per cent of Americans expected relations to get better if Mr Obama were elected and 30% if Mr McCain won the White House.
A similar poll conducted for BBC World Service ahead of the 2004 US presidential election found most countries would have preferred to see Democratic nominee John Kerry beat the incumbent George W Bush.
At the time, the Philippines, Nigeria and Poland were among the few countries to favour Mr Bushs re-election. All three now favour Mr Obama over Mr McCain.
In total 22,531 citizens were polled in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Kenya, Lebanon, Mexico, Nigeria, Panama, the Philippines, Poland, Russia, Singapore, Turkey, the UAE and the UK. A parallel survey was conducted with 1,000 US adults.
Answer: I'm with the rest of the world!!!
Obama/Biden 08!!!
Category: Politics
Presidential Election Singapore Public Holiday | Singapore ...
Presidential election singapore Public Holiday | Singapore Presidential Election 2011 Mr. Tan Kin Lian and Mr. Tan Jee Say Selected For Electio...
Mousavi as Zhao Ziyang, Khamenei as Deng Xiaoping, Ahmadinejad as Li Peng?
Ruhollah Khomeini as Mao Zedong?
Here are the Wikipedia articles.
Iranian presidential election, 2009
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_election_2009
Tiananmen Square protests of 1989
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989
Mir-Hossein Mousavi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir-Hossein_Mousavi
Zhao Ziyang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhao_Ziyang
Ali Khamenei
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei
Deng Xiaoping
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deng_Xiaoping
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad
Li Peng
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Peng
Ruhollah Khomeini
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruhollah_Khomeini
Mao Zedong
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Zedong
and before you say,
"Yeah, and look what happened",
consider.
If what I understand correctly, as well as the mass murder and brutal suppression of political dissidents, the Communist party in China maintains its rule by letting off some pressure in the form of:
(1) economic reforms
(2) easing up on cultural freedoms
and
(3) allowing Hong Kong to maintain a lot of its relative freedom.
Presumably Chinese might also be able to look to Macao, Taiwan, and Singapore.
What do the mullarchs in Iran have to offer the people
--the young people in particular
--particularly while Admadinejad is pro-natalist, China has pursued a "one-child" policy.
(1) Will admadinejad loosen up the economy--and anger many of his poorer supporters;
or make Los Angeles, and perhaps to a lesser extent London and (my beloved--ha!!) Toronto as de facto Iranian urban economic centres and capital?
(2) Will they ease up on the culture?
(3) Will they allow some autonomous zone of Freedom?
Answers and comments will be perused and appreciated.
:-)
Answer: Way to be optimistic.
Category: History
Presidential elections in Singapore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Presidential elections in Singapore, in which the President of Singapore is ...
Forum on the Presidential Elections | AWARE Singapore
Date: August 20, 2011, Saturday Time: 3.30pm to 5.00pm Venue: 9 Penang Road, #13-15 Park Mall (map) MARUAH (Working Group for an ASEAN Human R...
Presidential Elections - Singapore Elections Department
Legislations governing the conduct of the Presidential Election comprise ...
Singapore says four qualify for presidential election | Worlds express
Four candidates are eligible to contest this month's presidential election in Singapore, the government said on Thursday, paving the way for polls that will be seen as an unofficial referendum on the ruling People's ...
Presidential Election Singapore Public Holiday 2011 | Indiamr
Presidential election singapore Public Holiday 2011, Presidential election singapore Public Holiday | Singapore Presidential Election 2011Mr. Tan Kin Lian and Mr. Tan Jee Say Selected For Election President 2011 are ...
Singapore Presidential Election nomination day today | BorneoPost ...
Singapore Presidential Election nomination day today. Posted on August 17, 2011, Wednesday. SINGAPORE: Former Deputy Prime Minister Dr Tony Tan has arrived at the Nomination Centre at the People's Association headquarters on King ...
Presidential Election Singapore | Tan Jee Say Facebook
Presidential election singapore | Tan Jee Say Facebook Mr. Tan Kin Lian and Mr. Tan Jee Say Selected For Election President 2011 are selected i...
Singapore Presidential Race Will Be Contested | Singapore News Update
SINGAPORE - From Nomination Day tomorrow (Aug 17), right through to Polling Day on Aug 27,
philippiness al shaddai is the reincarnation of the 850 false prophets who fought against prophet elijah?
WHY DID AL SHADDAI CAME INTO BEING?
COULD IT BE THE REINCARNATION OF 850 FALSE PROPHETS WHO FOUGHT WITH
PROPHET ELIJAH ABOUT 2900 YEARS AGO.
PROPHET ELIJAH KILL ALL 850 FALSE PROPHETS.
THIS MADE QUEEN JEZEBEL ANGRY AND QUEENS JEZEBEL PROMISE TO KILL PROPHET ELIJAH.
PROPHET ELIJAH WENT INTO EXILE IN SINAI DESERT.
ONE DAY, CARDINAL JAIME SIN OF THE PHILIPPINE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH ASK AL SHADDAI FOR HELP
BUT AL SHADDAI LEADERS REFUSE TO HELP HIM.
During the impeachment trial of deposed President Joseph Estrada, Velarde rejected the call of then Archbishop Jaime Cardinal Sin to join a prayer rally urging Estrada to resign. Velarde said that El Shaddai members were free to join the rally of their own volition and reiterated that the movement was neither for nor against Estradas resignation.[citation
THIS WAS THE TURNING POINT IN ROMAN CATHOLIC AND AL SHADDAI RELATIONSHIP.
PRESIDENT FIDEL RAMOS A PROTESTANT ATTENDED AL SHADDAI FUNCTION.
SO, IT LOOK LIKE DURING THE ANTICHRIST ERA BETWEEN 2013 TO 2020
MRS IMELDA MARCOS COULD BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINE.
MRS IMEDLA MARCOS COULD COME TO POWER WITH THE HELP OF AL SHADDAI.
IF THERE IS A SPLIT AMONG ROMAN CATHOLIC OVER WOMENS RIGHT THEN
MRS IMELDA MARCOS COULD WIN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WITH 51% OF THE TOTAL VOTES COUNT.
IF IT IS THREE CORNER FIGHT THEN MRS MARCOS COULD GET 40% OF THE TOTAL VOTE COUNT. (40-30-30)
PHILIPPINE WOMEN SEE ABORTION AS A RIGHT OF ALL WOMEN.
THIS IS A NEW PROBLEM FOR THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH.
EVEN KRIS AQUINO THE DAUGHTER OF PRESIDENT CORAZON AQUINO HAD A BACKYARD ABORTION.
IT IS A CASE OF TOO MANY BOYFRIENDS?
ABOUT 400,000 ABORTION WERE PERFORM IN THE PHILIPPINE IN 1994.
1960 - 1970 = 4,000,000 ABORTION
1970 - 1980 = 4,000,000 ABORTION
1980 - 1990 = 4,000,000 ABORTION
1990 - 2000 = 4,000,000 ABOUTION
2000 - 2010 = 4,000,000 ABORTION
===========================
TOTAL = 20,000,000 ABORTION
===========================
FROM THIS FIGURE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT PHILIPPINE HAS LOST 20,000,000 BABIES THROUGHT ABORTION.
PHILIPPINE CURRENT POPULATIN S ABOUT 90,000,000?
HENCE, IF THERE IS NO ABORTIION IN THE PHILIPPINE THEN THE TOTAL POPULATION SHOULD BE 110,000,000 PEOPLE
RESPECTIVELY.
20,000,000 BABIES AT MARKET SINGAPORE PRICE
X RM 40,000 (SINGAPORE 20,000 DOLLARS)
=====================================
RM 200,000,000,000 ( RM 200 BILLION RINGGIT
=======================================
OR US$ 700,000,000 ( US700 BILLION DOLLARS)
IF PHILIPPINE HAD SOLD ALL 20,000,000 BABIES TO SINGAPORE THEN PHILIPPINE COULD HAVE
EARN ABOUT US$ 700 MILLION DOLLARS?
FINALLY, PRESIDENT MARCOS IS THE REINCARNTION OF KING AHAB OF ISRAEL.
MRS IMELDA MARCOS IS THE REINCARNATION OF JESEBEL THE DAUGHTER OF TYRE.
CARDINAL JAIME SIN IS THER EINCARNATION OF PROPHET ELIJAH.
PRESIDENT CARIZON AQUINO IS THE REINCARNATION OF THE WIDOW WHO GAVE ELIJAH THE UPPER ROOM TO SLEEP.
MR. NOYNOY AQUINO THE FUTURE PREISIDENT OF PHILIPPINE IS THE REINCARNATION OF THE WIDOWS SON.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Shaddai_(movement)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elijah
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=400+FALSE+PROPHET+FOR+JEZEBEL&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-701&xargs=0&pstart=1&b=21&xa=UN7oIjAxLSdTiPEyh1hrQA--,1257800344
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_Philippines
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1SHvkx-qQY
Answer: Wow ! all this and no one answered
Category: Religion & Spirituality
Four Candidates Eligible for Singapore Presidential Election - WSJ.com
5 days ago ... Four prospective candidates—Tony Tan, Tan Cheng Bock, Tan Kin Lian and Tan Jee Say—have been deemed eligible to run for Singapore's ...
Does the US have a FTA with Singapore currently? Why some politicians want the US to abolish this FTA?
Singapore should be the first Asian country to have a FTA with the US (from its web-site), but according to the US Presidential Elections website, some politicians are suggeting the abolishment of the FTA with Singapore. Why? When SIngapore has not offended any international issues like e.g. Cuba?
Answer: http://www.ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Singapore_FTA/Section_Index.html
Category: Politics
philippiness al shaddai is the reincarnation of the 850 false prophets who fought against prophet elijah?
WHY DID AL SHADDAI CAME INTO BEING?
COULD IT BE THE REINCARNATION OF 850 FALSE PROPHETS WHO FOUGHT WITH
PROPHET ELIJAH ABOUT 2900 YEARS AGO.
PROPHET ELIJAH KILL ALL 850 FALSE PROPHETS.
THIS MADE QUEEN JEZEBEL ANGRY AND QUEENS JEZEBEL PROMISE TO KILL PROPHET ELIJAH.
PROPHET ELIJAH WENT INTO EXILE IN SINAI DESERT.
ONE DAY, CARDINAL JAIME SIN OF THE PHILIPPINE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH ASK AL SHADDAI FOR HELP
BUT AL SHADDAI LEADERS REFUSE TO HELP HIM.
During the impeachment trial of deposed President Joseph Estrada, Velarde rejected the call of then Archbishop Jaime Cardinal Sin to join a prayer rally urging Estrada to resign. Velarde said that El Shaddai members were free to join the rally of their own volition and reiterated that the movement was neither for nor against Estradas resignation.[citation
THIS WAS THE TURNING POINT IN ROMAN CATHOLIC AND AL SHADDAI RELATIONSHIP.
PRESIDENT FIDEL RAMOS A PROTESTANT ATTENDED AL SHADDAI FUNCTION.
SO, IT LOOK LIKE DURING THE ANTICHRIST ERA BETWEEN 2013 TO 2020
MRS IMELDA MARCOS COULD BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINE.
MRS IMEDLA MARCOS COULD COME TO POWER WITH THE HELP OF AL SHADDAI.
IF THERE IS A SPLIT AMONG ROMAN CATHOLIC OVER WOMENS RIGHT THEN
MRS IMELDA MARCOS COULD WIN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WITH 51% OF THE TOTAL VOTES COUNT.
IF IT IS THREE CORNER FIGHT THEN MRS MARCOS COULD GET 40% OF THE TOTAL VOTE COUNT. (40-30-30)
PHILIPPINE WOMEN SEE ABORTION AS A RIGHT OF ALL WOMEN.
THIS IS A NEW PROBLEM FOR THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH.
EVEN KRIS AQUINO THE DAUGHTER OF PRESIDENT CORAZON AQUINO HAD A BACKYARD ABORTION.
IT IS A CASE OF TOO MANY BOYFRIENDS?
ABOUT 400,000 ABORTION WERE PERFORM IN THE PHILIPPINE IN 1994.
1960 - 1970 = 4,000,000 ABORTION
1970 - 1980 = 4,000,000 ABORTION
1980 - 1990 = 4,000,000 ABORTION
1990 - 2000 = 4,000,000 ABOUTION
2000 - 2010 = 4,000,000 ABORTION
===========================
TOTAL = 20,000,000 ABORTION
===========================
FROM THIS FIGURE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT PHILIPPINE HAS LOST 20,000,000 BABIES THROUGHT ABORTION.
PHILIPPINE CURRENT POPULATIN S ABOUT 90,000,000?
HENCE, IF THERE IS NO ABORTIION IN THE PHILIPPINE THEN THE TOTAL POPULATION SHOULD BE 110,000,000 PEOPLE
RESPECTIVELY.
20,000,000 BABIES AT MARKET SINGAPORE PRICE
X RM 40,000 (SINGAPORE 20,000 DOLLARS)
=====================================
RM 200,000,000,000 ( RM 200 BILLION RINGGIT
=======================================
OR US$ 700,000,000 ( US700 BILLION DOLLARS)
IF PHILIPPINE HAD SOLD ALL 20,000,000 BABIES TO SINGAPORE THEN PHILIPPINE COULD HAVE
EARN ABOUT US$ 700 MILLION DOLLARS?
FINALLY, PRESIDENT MARCOS IS THE REINCARNTION OF KING AHAB OF ISRAEL.
MRS IMELDA MARCOS IS THE REINCARNATION OF JESEBEL THE DAUGHTER OF TYRE.
CARDINAL JAIME SIN IS THER EINCARNATION OF PROPHET ELIJAH.
PRESIDENT CARIZON AQUINO IS THE REINCARNATION OF THE WIDOW WHO GAVE ELIAH THE UPPER ROOM TO SLEEP.
MR. NOYNOY AQUINO THE FUTURE PREISIDENT OF PHILIPPINE IS THE REINCARNATION OF THE WIDOWS SON.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Shaddai_(movement)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elijah
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=400+FALSE+PROPHET+FOR+JEZEBEL&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-701&xargs=0&pstart=1&b=21&xa=UN7oIjAxLSdTiPEyh1hrQA--,1257800344
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_Philippines
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1SHvkx-qQY
Answer: If you say so. It makes no more or less sense than much of the mumbo jumbo that believers spout.
Category: Religion & Spirituality
Singapore Elections Department
Conduct of Elections. As an election administrator, we plan, prepare for, and manage the conduct of Presidential and Parliamentary elections in Singapore. ...